~/tokens/scam $ cat index-token-apdeyt-84-percent.md
$INDEX Update: +84% following the verdict, but social media platforms still haven't appeared
The Index continues to rise: since our analysis a week ago, the price has jumped another +84%. The pool has indeed proven to be deep-$1.9M in liquidity remains, and a daily volume of $9M indicates active trading. But the signals are mixed: the token is soaring WITHOUT social media buzz and WITHOUT mentions from our watchlist.
What’s Changed Over the Week
We gave it a 5/10 rating-a degen roulette with a deep pool, but no proof of quality. Over the past week, the metrics have changed:
- Price: +106% in the first 24 hours, then +84% overall-the growth is holding steady, no crash
- Liquidity: stable at $1.9M-it hasn’t drained away, as happens in 80% of meme coin cases
- Turnover to liquidity: 4.9x-active trading, not stagnation
- Age: 336 hours (14 days)-it has weathered the first wave of volatility, which is a plus for stability
The previous verdict has been partially confirmed: the pool is indeed deep, and the scam probability is currently below the average for meme coins.
What’s concerning
But growth is happening in a vacuum. No social media, no website, no mentions in our watchlists of major accounts. FDV has grown to $27.3M with liquidity of only $1.9M-a ratio of 14.6x. This means that the bulk of the supply isn’t being traded but is being held somewhere. According to our database:
- Meme coins with a turnover of ≥3x and liquidity >$100k crash in 36% of cases (n=14)
- A lack of social media presence leads to a crash in 30% of cases (n=10)
- The market is overheated: a market index of ≥70 → a crash is likely in 50% of cases, all other things being equal
Rise without a social media surge suggests two scenarios: either an insider group is quietly pumping the price, or bots are creating the appearance of activity. The buy/sell ratio (5071/3709 = 1.37) looks healthy, but on a meme coin, this could be any kind of load.
Verdict
The pool is holding up-that’s a fact. But its quality is proven by only one metric: liquidity. There’s no social media presence, the distribution is unknown, and the index is overheated. The risk of a dump is still high, although the likelihood of a scam (a complete lock-up) is lower now than it was a week ago.
Updated verdict: 5.5/10. The pool has proven it’s active, but without social pressure and in the absence of visible holders, this remains pure roulette. Entering the market based on the near-term chart is risky-day traders are already in position.