~ /t/bluai $ cat defi_dossier.json
defi_onchain
bsc
dex snapshot_stale security_stale uts_stale UTS 35/100
scanner_snapshot · auto-created
$BLUAI - token dossier
Automated DeFi dossier with the contract, historical pool snapshot, on-chain risks and tracked signals.
[data refresh] The DEX metrics snapshot is over 6 hours old. Values below are historical; the chart separately attempts to fetch fresh candles and may retain its old snapshot on failure.
[risk refresh] The on-chain security check and UTS is over 6 hours old. This is a historical assessment, not a current risk guarantee.
$ resolve --contract verified by chain + address
market DEX / DeFi
network bsc
venue pancakeswap-v3-bsc market@ August 12, 2026 · 05:45 UTC · 28 days ago · stale
security@ August 11, 2026 · 14:30 UTC · 28 days ago · stale UTS@ August 12, 2026 · 05:45 UTC · 28 days ago · stale
$ snapshot --last-scan August 12, 2026
price: $0.01279 · liquidity: $756K · 24h volume: $12.6M
FDV: $127.5M · age: 296d · 24h trades: 49235 buy / 51985 sell
contract: 0xed9ae3def8d6f0529…
copy
· DEXScreener ↗
$ security --snapshot August 11, 2026 · 14:30 UTC · 28 days ago · stale
// on-chain intelligence · 38 151 holders
Top 10 Wallets 89.9%
deployer 0%
LP is blocked 0%
Mint has been recalled Sales are up
$ launch_check --score 45/100 · data known 100% · DEX · security stale
✗ LP lock: failed (0%)
✓ Mint authority revoked: passed
✗ Contract ownership renounced: failed
✓ Sellability / honeypot check: passed
✓ Trading tax: passed (0% max)
✗ Top-10 holder concentration: failed (90% held)
✓ Deployer allocation: passed (0% held)
✓ Holder count: passed (38,151)
✗ Social presence: failed (not detected)
✓ Pool age: passed (296d)
! Deployer history: needs attention (1 tokens, 0 rugs)
! Launch provenance: needs attention (DEX listing)
$ uts --why 35/100 // why this score · August 12, 2026 · 05:45 UTC · 28 days ago stale
quality core: LQS 45 (100% known) · market 6/10 · on-chain bonus 1.75
signal contributions (learned weights; n = outcomes in our database)
+ EVM network (+0.72, n=103)
+ pool is older than 7 days (+0.69, n=97)
+ liquidity > $100k (+0.49, n=147)
+ FDV/liquidity > 100x (+0.48, n=20)
+ top holder has rug history (+0.36, n=25)
+ less than 50% of LP is locked (+0.34, n=67)
+ no social accounts or website (+0.33, n=166)
− repeat-rug wallet among top holders (-0.3, n=4)
hard caps: LP is not locked
The score follows a fixed method: the same input produces the same output. Signal weights are recalculated daily from the 24h and 7d outcomes of every observed token, including rejected candidates.
$ actors --smart-money // smart money among top holders
✗ wallets linked to rugs: 2
// price · $BLUAI
15m
1h
4h
1D
log
// coverage · 0
$ coverage --status watching
No editorial verdict yet. The scanner is already updating this dossier; the first review and verifiable outcome will appear here automatically.
/gems · /track
This is not financial advice. DYOR._