BTC $- · ETH $- · SOL $- · BNB $- · XRP $- · DOGE $- · TON $- · ADA $- · AVAX $- · LINK $- · SUI $- · TRX $- · gas - gwei degen 68/100

~/tokens/scam $ cat hoodrat-apdeyt-81-percent-pad-raspredelenie.md

tokens 詐欺の分析 upd $HOODRAT ·2026年8月2日 SCAM 2/10

$HOODRAT update: -81% confirmed the verdict, but the distribution remained a trap

crptch チーム · 分析デスク · 3 読了時間

// price · $HOODRAT
― px╌ ma8▮ volH $0.00857 · L $0.000961$0.00448$0.00338$0.00228$0.00156-60.9%31.07 13:0001.08 12:00現在

$HOODRAT (Hoodrat) on the Robinhood Chain has fallen 81% since our first analysis, when the token surged 211% and we gave it a 7/10 rating. The price dropped from ~$0.008 to $0.00155, fully confirming the pattern we wrote about: concentrated holdings + no social media presence = insider dumping.

What’s Left of the Hype

Formally, only the volume figures remain intact. A daily trading volume of $5.26M with liquidity of $203k represents a hefty 25.9x turnover, and technically, the pool hasn’t been rug-pulled. There were 14,758 buyers versus 11,808 sellers over the day-almost parity. It would seem that trading is alive and well.

But this volume is the entry point for a dump. The FDV is inflated to 7.6x above liquidity (1.54M vs. 203k), which is typical for tokens where top holders are biding their time. The pool’s age is 738 hours (over 30 days)-the token was given time, but the concentration has yet to dissipate.

The distribution remains a trap

This is exactly what the crptch engine flagged in red a month ago: no social media presence and no mentions from major accounts. Under these circumstances, the token survives on micro-retail investors who buy up the token during a dump. Our database’s patterns are strict: in 31% of cases, tokens without social media presence see a drop of -80%+, and HOODRAT fits this pattern exactly.

A red flag we underestimated: -65% in one day (current data). According to our calibration, tokens with a score of 7-8 have a median drop of -78% over a week precisely because the visually active volume masks a structural flaw in the distribution. We overestimated it.

Why a recovery is unlikely

Even with a live pool, three barriers prevent the token from rebounding:

  • Dead social media: not a single mention from the watchlist, no website, no activity. Without this, growth depends solely on technical noise and micro-retail trading.
  • Price behavior: -65% in 24 hours on live volume is a classic insider dump, which is accelerating by the day. A rebound is unlikely until the selling dries up.
  • Holding concentration: The initial analysis pointed to a risk in the distribution. After the drop, this risk does not disappear-it crystallizes into losses for retail investors.

The verdict of the first analysis (7/10) was overrated. In fact, the token warranted a score of 4-5 (SKIP / CASINO) due to the lack of social media presence and concentration. Our calibration for zones 7-8 shows: a median of -88% over the week, with 63% of tokens in the red. HOODRAT fit these statistics exactly.

// token_history · $HOODRAT 完全な資料 →

[tg token alerts] ✓ 実績